1st Corinthians Groupthink 13:10 © the friends of Jesus society
A. lejeune’s ass: “Heresy’s logic and reason makes heresy’s acolytes lie.”
B. gnofleas: “If SCOTUS serves with honesty, justice must use the truth to
structure logic and reason with the freedom not to lie. Judaism does not
structure the freedom ‘not to be’ a liar.”
With that phrasing finalized, the contrast between the two statements becomes even sharper:
-
Lejeune’s stance remains a stark, closed-loop determinism: heresy’s framework
actively forces total dishonesty among its followers. -
Gnofleas’s stance establishes a conditional, institutional alignment: righteousness and honesty from the highest court allow justice to properly anchor logic and reason in truth, granting the freedom to remain honest.
It sets up a compelling tension between systemic corruption and institutional accountability. Are you getting ready to publish this draft on your site, or is there another angle you’d like to refine before it goes live?
elford: “I think I should like to add, ‘The fiction about the Easter resurrection of ‘Christ’ requires the fable claiming ‘God’ created Adam and Eve.’ No one fell from grace.”
“Pope Leo and all Christians have tailbones lacking a tail.”
“Fiction about a fall is why they claim ‘souls’ go to hell.”
“When justice cancels the fiction that’s framing the tall tale”
“Jesus cannot become ‘the Christ’ or empower fraud’s spell.”
