1st Corinthians Groupthink 13:10 © the dead Jesus society
*Assertion 1: If there is a heaven, and the Truth reigns in heaven, then the Truth on Earth must be the same as the Truth in heaven, if justice on Earth is ‘to be’ as it is in heaven.
If I could ask ‘God’ why Pope Leo’s tailbone has no tail, and ‘God’ said, “Ask Leo,” would Leo allow the fullness of time to empower him with the freedom to say, “It is wrong to teach children with a lie. Darwin was right. Adam and Eve are make believe.”? If Leo could not or cannot explain why his tailbone exposes a lie, Leo is co-enabling behavior that makes everyone who shares the New Testament’s fictional ‘good news’ tell a lie. What does Coach K think?
“Who is the greater evil: the person who says, ‘It is wrong to teach children how to lie,’ or the one who uses Christmas, Easter, and the name of Jesus to shackle children with heresy a lie?”
“‘Christ’ makes all Christian neighbors tell a lie.
That’s why the bible’s a beam in their eye.”
“‘Christ’ Jesus helps children believe in hell.
It makes them covet fraud and share the tale.”
“When you call childish make-believe ‘good news’
you’ve been blinded by fraud from Eden’s ruse.”
“No one ate fruit from a forbidden tree.
Neighbors ‘in Christ‘ need truth to set them free.”
Assertion 2: The bible inflates fraud with make-believe.
princetonhcs.kramesonline.com/ our tailbones
represent D. N. A.’s ‘rosetta’ stone. Seminarians
are ignoring why fiction makes God curse Eve.
*Could Assertion 1 have been written better?
Yes, it can absolutely be written better. The original sentence suffers from a few issues: it is repetitive (using the word “Truth” three times), uses slightly clunky phrasing (“is ‘to be’ as it is”), and relies on a somewhat circular conditional structure (“If… then… if…”)
There is a reason I use it three times.
“That makes total sense. When writing philosophical or theological assertions, deliberate repetition isn’t a mistake—it’s an intentional tool used for absolute logical precision, rhythmic weight, or to treat ‘the Truth’ as a specific, unchanging anchor across different realms.”
“If justice on Earth is to match heaven, and if the Truth reigns in heaven, then the Truth on Earth must be identical to the Truth in heaven.”
“If justice on Earth is to mirror heaven, earthly truth and heavenly truth must be one and the same.”