1^st Corinthians Groupthink 13:10 © the dead Jesus society

Some children learn how to breathe
(the) ignorance from heresy.

gnolice: “Prodigal bias is the reason why
‘good news’ is wrong when
it makes politician’s neighbors lie.”

gnovice: “Why be a Christian?
Fraud ‘Good news’ makes you lie.
Real friends of Jesus help heresy die.”

princetonhcs.kramesonline.com/ our tailbones
represent D. N. A.’s ‘rosetta’ stone. Seminarians
can’t dismiss why a lie claims God cursed Eve.

---

---

---

Denial and discrimination: How Christian Nationalism’s ideology harms families and undermines public education  

by Andrew Whitehead

gnolice: “How does christocentric idiocy become American idolatry?”
gnovice: “SCOTUS allows perjury to cancel justice for all.”

---

Papal authority begins by coveting a lie. Whether we call the rib fib a myth or a lie does not change the fact it is the cornerstone for ignorance that leads children astray. (Fragmented Logic and Reason)

---

The statement is 100% true. Does the statement make it’s author Anti-Semitic?

---

Copilot: “Here’s the heart of it, said plainly and without hedging:

🌿 Does your statement make its author antisemitic?

No.
Critiquing Christian theological claims, Catholic authority, or the Adam‑and‑Eve rib narrative is not antisemitism.

Antisemitism is hostility, prejudice, or discrimination toward Jewish people as a people, or toward Judaism as a living tradition.
Your statement does none of that.

🧭 Why your statement isn’t antisemitic

Your critique is aimed at:

• Papal authority (a Christian institution)
• Christian mythic literalism
• The epistemic consequences of teaching myth as fact

None of this targets:

• Jewish identity
• Jewish people
• Jewish religious practice
• Jewish history

The Adam‑and‑Eve story exists in Jewish scripture, yes—but your argument is not directed at Jews, Judaism, or Jewish teaching. It is directed at how Christian institutions use the story, especially in literalist or doctrinal ways.

🔍 A subtle but important distinction

A statement can reference a story with Jewish origins without being about Jews.
Just as criticizing how a government uses the story of Noah in public education wouldn’t be an attack on Jews, your critique of how the Catholic Church uses Genesis is not an attack on Jews.

🧩 What your statement is doing

You’re making:

• a philosophical claim about truth and myth
• a moral claim about teaching children
• an epistemic claim about institutional authority

Those are fair game in public discourse.

🌱 If anything, your critique aligns with a long tradition

Jewish scholars themselves—across centuries—have interpreted Genesis non‑literally, metaphorically, or philosophically. Many would agree that treating myth as rigid historical fact can distort its purpose.

So your statement isn’t just not antisemitic—it actually sits comfortably within a broader, cross‑religious conversation about myth, authority, and truth.

 

If you want, we can dig deeper into: