‘pushing the barrier, lifting the veil.’
(Jesus +/– Christ )

Let’s imagine that Jesus was real and that he believed it was wrong to lie and teach children with truth that is not true.

Let’s imagine Jesus saying, “It is wrong to teach children with a lie.”

Now, let’s imagine Time allowing ‘2,000 years’ to pass, so ‘amazing grace’ could present Americans with the Anti-Christ perspective, which also represents the view that it is inherently wrong to teach children with a lie while telling them the lie is grace from ‘God.’

Should the person who presents the viewpoint that claims “It is wrong to teach children with a lie” be called the Anti-Christ?

The imagery of Christ is created by the bible’s rib bone fib. The fib evolved into ‘a messiah’ that camouflages the lie claiming ‘God’ created Adam and Eve. ‘Christ’ is ‘glorified’ window dressing for the heresy of atonement doctrine, which the Pope exalts as the only real solution for humanity’s many ills. That’s hokum. The Pope is an avatar for the heresy that was ‘created’ with the fiction about Adam and Eve. John 3:16 reboots the Old Testament’s heresy by turning the truth about Jesus into affection for the lies framing the heresy … with the imagery of Christ being portrayed as grace from ‘God.’

Bias impedes the blessing of justice for all.

“When grace the Anti-Christ perspective illuminates truth that’s flawed 
Duke Divinity’s perjury is ‘done away with’ tarred and feathered.”
1^st Corinthians 13:10 © the new- Biden & Trump translation