by Uncle Sam’s kinder-gentler Anti-Christ*

“I’m executing a blueprint to push back illiberalism and I’d like you to be directly involved. The blueprint has a two-fold aim: first, to restore free speech and open inquiry as non-partisan values; and second, to reveal the implications of far-left ideological takeover.” @drpeterboghossian

Jesus was never quoted or given credit for saying, “The acolytes who’ve been touched by amazing grace do not teach children with a lie.” Would that statement belief still be true today?

Hello Peter,

My name is Bill and I’m working on a hack* to free Americans from ignorance stamped holy. Western culture has evolved into the belief that it is God’s will to teach children with a lie. SCOTUS reinforces the temptation for all Americans to sacrifice their personal integrity and ‘sign on’ as citizens who chant ‘In God We Trust with childish make believe.’

But I digress.

Can the ‘belief’ that we serve the greater good by teaching children how to speak with truth, in contrast to teaching them how to speak with lies, be confused with or labeled as a “far-left ideological takeover?” Our pursuit of equality, liberty, and justice for all has absolutely nothing to do with the far left.

Psychological Warfare

True or False?

People who have sold their ‘souls’ to ‘the great lie’ tell children that ‘God’ must send some souls to hell. The people who do the most damage, betsy, become republicans who champion against justice for all in favor of freedom to club children with a rib bone fib.

(ruth: “I didn’t know Christians could be Democrats until I got to college.” )

If God’s love isn’t left or right of center, because God’s love is perfect, can ‘perfect love’ intervene and allow all Christians the freedom to understand it is wrong to teach children with the lie.

God did not curse Eve.

If “civil liberties” include freedom to slander God and teach children with a lie,  would Jesus be considered an “enemy combatant” if he could say, “I know why you have a tailbone that does not grow a tail!”?