2023.04.20 “Duke Divinity’s Anarchy” wc 642

by Uncle Sam’s kinder-gentler Anti-Christ

badger: “How does God’s grace free professors who’ve become conflicted?”

Psychological Warfare

Assertion: “It is wrong to teach children with a lie.”

SCOTUS does not have the authority to grant Christians, who are all ‘subset’ members of the KKK, the freedom to rebel against God’s blessing. The Pope does not represent grace from God.

When Duke Seminary’s leadership says, “It’s okay for our graduates to teach children with a lie” because they believe SCOTUS interprets the religion clause correctly, they’ve screwed the pooch and all of America’s children suffer.

Why does Duke Divinity want to teach their students with a lie? Why can’t grace include the truth that sets Christians free from the fraud that began with a forbidden tree?

Let’s help Duke Seminary, SCOTUS, and both Houses of Congress connect the dots and bring the end time to Christian anarchy in America.

If Christians rebel against the truth, which flows from heaven’s throne like living water, they are members of the KKK. Why worship ‘God’ with a lie that causes division and strife instead of the truth that fosters love for one another? Would Jesus rebel against God’s blessing? Should Duke?

Why do Christians want to rebel against the truth, which represents grace from God? Let’s make that the first dot (A). The truth is grace from ‘God.’ It explains why the pope has a tailbone with no tail. Anarchy stops the blessing that empowers justice for all.

Why do Duke’s professors want to ignore the reason why they have a tailbone that did not grow a tail?  Does SCOTUS grant them the freedom to ignore why, so they can ignore God’s blessing and pretend ignorance is protected by the religion clause because SCOTUS says so? What exactly is God’s blessing for America meant to be? Is it to free Christians from the heresy of atonement doctrine, or to put lipstick on the rib bone fib and pretend Jesus was resurrected so we could all escape eternal damnation?

Would ‘God’ use perjured truth to set the captives free from the fraud that begins with a forbidden tree? Atonement doctrine is heresy because no one fell from grace.

The perjured truth is the second dot (B). If you cannot covet perjured truth because doing so prevents ‘God’ from using real truth to ‘set captives free’ you cannot put lipstick on the rib bone fib and teach children with a lie. When you ignore the first dot and covet the second you become an anarchist who cannot and will not walk with the truth that sets the captives free from the fraud that begins with Eden’s fabled tree. God’s amazing grace helps Christians repent and hold hands with Darwinism, not teach children with a lie.

The third dot (C) is the realization that it is wrong to teach children with a lie and tailbones prove Genesis is simply childish make-believe functioning as the cornerstone for primitive fundamentalism instead of amazing grace.

When is actual repentance from Duke Divinity’s belief that “it is okay to ignore our tailbones and pretend ‘God’ made Adam and Eve” we’ve squared the circle that stops the Klan from dividing our nation with New Testament ‘lipstick’ on the bible’s rib bone fib.

“The stations of the cross obscure the lie
using a rib bone fib to make folks fear hell.
There was no fall. The Torah’s elders lied.
Sliding Rock is ‘way more fun’ without a tail.” 


“When grace illuminates the second mile
cognitive dissonance is ‘done away with.’”
1st Corinthians 13:10 © Anti-Christ translation

Exhibit A

Exhibit B
…….jpeg princeton/#tailbones are our ‘rosetta’ stone

“Transylvania birthed the truth
meant to set captives free
from the fear that entraps with
heresy’s forbidden tree.”

“It is wrong to slander ‘God.’
You cannot say, ‘God cursed Eve.’
When we choose to walk with truth
we jettison heresy make-believe.”