by elford, the Anti Christ
(notable handicaps: hyper dyslexia and tongue-in-cheek syndrome)

“Psychological Warfare”
(Justitia’s Seventh Seal)

plop, plop, fizz, fizz

“the curtain of darkness peeled away”

True or False?

If the truth sets captives free perjured truth does not. 

If ‘A’ is the statement ‘the truth sets captives free’ and ‘B’ is ‘Perjured truth does not,’ what happens when we ask the question “Can perjured truth lead to ‘a form of godliness that denies the power thereof?'”

Let’s make an assumption that states “All Christians believe the truth sets captives free, because it says so somewhere in their bible.” If Jesus shared the truth that set the captives free from “a form of godliness that denies the power thereof,” and that “form of godliness” began with the heresy of atonement doctrine, how can putting lipstick on the heresy stop Christianity from being another “form of godliness that denies the power thereof?”

Albert stated the matter plainly when he said “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking that created them.” Genesis frames the heresy of atonement doctrine as the only means to escape “the wrath of God.” The NT does the very same thing with the imagery of Christ, risen. The imagery of “Christ” is lipstick on the fraud that leaves Judeo-Christian theology fundamentally flawed. People who worship ‘God’ with perjured truth don’t act right. The GOP is a perfect example of “godliness that denies the power thereof.”

If perjured truth cannot set the captives free, because it makes the captive walk with the fear of purgatory and eternal damnation, what truth is required to set the Christians free from their fear of purgatory and eternal damnation?

When we ask Christians to give us a truthful reason for why their tailbone has no tail their logic and reason hemorrhage. They either will not speak the truth plainly or they cannot speak the truth plainly. If there is a form of godliness that does not deny the power thereof, does that form allow the user to speak the truth plainly? Did Jesus?

Christian intellectualism handicaps grace (i.e., equality, liberty, and justice for all) because it uses perjured truth (i.e., fiction) as a baseline for the interpretation of wisdom, knowledge, and understanding.

When fiction perjures the truth, and Genesis perjures the truth because no one named Adam or Eve ate fruit from a forbidden tree, it, the fiction, leads to “a form of godliness that denies the power thereof.”

That is why everyone who believes John 3:16 is true, even while sincerely doing so, is a member of the KKK. The KKK represents “garbage out.” The hatred from the initial fraud found in Genesis is normalized with Christmas, Easter, and the Eucharist. That makes Christmas, Easter, and the Eucharist lipstick on the perjured truth that includes the slander claiming ‘God’ cursed Eve.

Satan isn’t real. Jesus died.

“The stations of the cross obscure the lie
using a rib fib to lead folk astray.
There was no fall. The Torah’s elders lied.
The lie fosters integrity’s decay.”

“When grace illuminates how the truth has become flawed
cognitive dissonance is ‘done away with.’”
1^st Corinthians 13:10 © Anti Christ translation

From the Collective