“Literacy”

plop, plop, fizz, fizz

“As a Bible-believing follower of Jesus Christ, my rights should be protected. Even if my sincerely held religious beliefs might be the minority, I still have a right to hold them.” Franklin Graham

Tuning Theological Correctness

Franklin Graham has rights. He has the right to be taught with truth. When that right is violated, and his right was, it leads everyone clubbed with a rib bone fib to believe the Bible is the word of God for the people of God. Grace frees people from ignorance. Ignorance begins with Adam and Eve.

Had Franklin been taught with truth, when he attended the first grade, he would have learned why he has a tailbone and no tail. Instead of learning how to walk with ‘God,’ with the truth at his side, he learned how to walk with the heresy of atonement doctrine. Everyone who walks with heresy walks with ‘a form of godliness that denies the power thereof.’ That’s just the way it is. God does not sponsor the fraud that resurrected the memory of Jesus with the imagery of Christ. God didn’t curse Eve either. The Torah slanders God and entraps those it entangles with the heresy of atonement doctrine. Camouflaging the fraud with the sweet name of Jesus still will not help Franklin embrace his right to be educated with the truth. Truth frees him from make-believe using a forbidden tree to make millions believe that Satan is real.

If SCOTUS had corrected the problem that still leads to American illiteracy, shortly after Darwin published his treatise highlighting evolution, Franklin and his father, Billy would have never been exposed to ignorance stamped holy. Their right to be taught with the truth was violated by SCOTUS’s lack of due diligence.

Franklin doesn’t understand that Adam and Eve are make-believe. Franklin believes the fiction in Genesis represents literal truth. SCOTUS knows ‘God’ did not create Adam and Eve. SCOTUS knows Genesis is a myth. SCOTUS knows the myth is responsible for John 3:16 and that Jesus actually died. SCOTUS has chosen to chaperon the fiction that perjures truth and allows people like Franklin to covet the stupidity that dwells in everyone who lost their right to be taught with actual truth.

Franklin has rights. He has the right to know the cornerstone for Judaism 2.0 is the same heresy that serves as the cornerstone for Judaism 1.0. SCOTUS denies Franklin the right to be a man who walks with truth by co-enabling the fraud that is sustained by a false interpretation of the religion clause.

Dear Franklin,
I am sorry that you and Billy were caught in the lie that begins with Adam and Eve. You have a tailbone because Darwin was right. You and your father deserved better, but the Popes helped deny you both an education that would have allowed you to know grace frees us from perjured truth. John 3:16 shackles you to the fraud Jesus called childish make-believe. There is no day of judgment waiting on anyone’s horizon. The end time for ignorance frees the body of Christ from the heresy of atonement doctrine. That means we can ‘love one another’ the way Jesus meant for us to, without the irrational fears causing chaos, division, and strife.

Your concerned neighbor,
elford

Satan isn’t real. Jesus died.

“The stations of the cross obscure the lie
using a rib fib to lead folk astray.
There was no fall. The Torah’s elders lied.
The lie fosters integrity’s decay.”

jpeg.princeton

“When grace illuminates how the truth has become flawed
cognitive dissonance is ‘done away with.’”
1^st Corinthians 13:10 © Anti Christ translation

Can people be persecuted for not walking with the truth if truth represents grace from God? Do the members of the KKK have the right not to be persecuted for being racists?

If truth represents grace from God and people decide fiction is better than truth, should their affection for the fraud that comes from the fiction be challenged (persecuted)? Are more perfect unions more perfect because they seek to reach those entrapped by the make-believe some cultures enshrine as the gateway to heaven? Should fraud be allowed to make God’s grace null and void? If SCOTUS chooses to ignore the truth that sets Franklin and his brethren (which includes the KKK) free are they not guilty of high treason. Can high treason make Franklin feel persecuted because he’s been brainwashed by the ignorance SCOTUS chooses to protect? How convoluted should we make this argument if we want to square the circle?

If justice is real, should Franklin Jr. have the right not to be taught with fiction 2.0, John?