2020.02.01 “Who was Jesus?” wc 262

Theological Correctness

“Resurrecting Jesus … with Liberation Theology”

subversive adj. “Intended or serving to undermine or overthrow, such as an established government. One who advocates or is regarded as advocating subversive means or policies.” (AHD)

elford: “If we ask the question ‘Who was Jesus?,’ no one in ‘the body of Christ’ can answer correctly. Why?”

dr tom: “The writing in the NT represents fertile fiction, part two.”

huck: “That is why we call Christianity ‘Judaism 2.0.’ Jesus was not an orthodox Jew. He adapted to the façade by questioning the validity of atonement doctrine because he understood Adam and Eve were a gateway for faith that was built upon a foundation of childish make believe.”

kathy sue: “Almost everyone loves a good story. Apparently Jesus liked parables. Grandpa likes words that rhyme.”

(Jesus:) “The Anti Christ helps SCOTUS exalt truth.
Atonement doctrine’s acolytes are flawed.
There was no fall from Original Sin.
Justice for all can’t co-exist with fraud.”

elford: “Jesus was an ‘Asimovian Jew.’ He believed equality, liberty, and justice for all were excellent pillars (heuristics) for social cohesion. He believed in solvent criticism. Solvent criticism eviscerates the validity of atonement doctrine, biblical creationism and the falsified accounts of his and Lazarus’ resurrection.”

“Form follows function.”

Procreate.

Satan isn’t real. Jesus died.

“The stations of the cross obscure the lie
using a rib fib to lead folk astray.
There was no fall. The Torah’s elders lied.
The lie fosters integrity’s decay.”

jpeg.princeton