Theological Correctness
gnofleas: “I believe the court’s theists must be willing to answer four questions in order to escape the appearance of impropriety.”
1. Can a safe haven for children be a safe haven for children when the children are taught with perjured truth?
2. Does ‘God’ have the right to inspire someone to stand against the perjured truth?
3. Did Jesus stand against perjured truth?
chief justice of the mire: “What’s the fourth question?”
gnofleas: “Why do you all have tailbones and no tail?”
dr tom: “When nine judges agree that ‘DNA explains why our species has tailbones and no tails’ they undermine the validity of biblical creationism, the very cornerstone for Judaism 1 and 2.0.”
Justitia: “When we subtract the fraud from the myth John 3:16 is done away with.”
Satan isn’t real. Jesus died.
“The stations of the cross obscure the lie
using a rib fib to lead folk astray.
There was no fall. The Torah’s elders lied.
The lie fosters integrity’s decay.”
“When grace illuminates truth that’s flawed
cognitive dissonance is ‘done away with.’”
1st Corinthians 13:10 © Anti Christ translation
“What kind of sophistry causes a chief justice of the Supreme Court to lick the Pope’s balls?”
class: “Once there was a campfire in the land with a Dead Sea where Semites used a whopper to give wings to heresy.”
dr tom: “All (Christian) ministers give fraud fellatio
when they teach children to believe in hell.
There was no fall from Original Sin.
Grace frees folk from atonement doctrine’s spell.”
kathy sue: “‘Raise up thy thoughts above the skye’
and kiss that god damned fraud good-bye.”




