(aiming higher)    https://wp.me/p3Dy1G-4JH

Psychological Warfare 505
“New eyes to see the dawn.”

–

Assertion: “Christian ministers covet fraud and pretend its grace from God.”

gnofleas: “Let’s see if we can provide evidence that makes this assertion True.”

kathy sue: “Exhibit A is the diagram of a tailbone. We are human beings who walk upright but we have no tail. The answer to the question ‘why do we have no tail?’ reveals Christians as folk who walk with imperfect understanding.”

tom: “DNA explains that we evolved from a species that had tails. When we live in denial of truth, by coveting perjured truth, we become hypocrites when we think of ourselves as godly. Jesus thought the orthodox Jews were charlatans and liars because he knew atonement doctrine was hokum.”

huck: “DNA helps us see into our past and that past makes the myth about Adam and Eve unsuitable for Christian genuine faith. The memory of Jesus cannot be anointed with the imagery of Christ unless an act of fraud occurs. That fraud begins a second time with fake news about a resurrection. The fact we have a tailbone means the resurrection is fake news used to help Gentiles embrace atonement doctrine and be born-again hybrid Jews.”

chief justice: “Just because there was no actual fall from grace does not mean Jesus didn’t rise from the grave to save the body of Christ from judgment and eternal damnation.”

gnofleas: “ Actually John, we can prove your assertion is incorrect by asking a simple question. Does God require the use of fraud or perjured Truth to save souls?”

gnolice: “If your answer is no, Jesus did not rise to become a servant of the fraud that began by pretending there was a fall. When we subtract Eden’s myth, atonement doctrine inherits the whirlwind.”
gnovice: “The memory of Jesus cannot be anointed with the imagery of Christ unless we pretend ‘God’ has chosen to participate in Judaism’s ruse. If the only way ‘God’ can save souls, as Catholicism alleges, is with the blood of a glorified lamb, ‘God’ becomes a co-conspirator of fraud that began by pretending Adam and Eve ate from a forbidden tree.”

gnolitter: “Did God raise Jesus so we could believe the fiction was true, or, has someone used the belief in the existence of God to encourage neighbors to embrace perjured Truth as Good News?”

tom: “The evidence showing we have a tailbone means ‘God’ has nothing to do with validating the authenticity of atonement doctrine’s heresy. It wasn’t ‘God’ who inspired John 3:16. John 3:16 obscures grace. Its camouflaging  the ruse by personifying the fiction structuring an act of original sin.”

jpeg-princeton.png

class: “Our tailbones render the causality from eating forbidden fruit null and void when the Roberts court determines atonement doctrine is a threat to the mental health of all Americans. Everything downstream from the fiction about a fall is simply glorified hokum.”

gnolice: “Creationism’s hokum is a beam in every eye”
gnovice: “choosing to circle wagons so they can covet a lie.”

gnofleas: “Why does ‘God’ use the passage of time to help ‘elford’ grasp the importance of the Anti Christ perspective?”

kathy sue: “We cannot ‘solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.’ Jesus spoke against the validity of atonement doctrine. The imagery of Christ is the personification of atonement doctrine. The Anti Christ perspective is required to defeat the heresy that began with fiction about Original Sin. When we separate the memory of Jesus from the imagery of Christ we begin to connect the dots that empower equality, liberty and justice for all.”